ABSTRACT
Abstract Purpose: The effect of a prophylactic oleuropein-rich diet before anesthesia accompanied by the widely-used steroid-based neuromuscular drug rocuronium on mast cell activation was investigated in the study. Methods: 14 rabbits used in the study. The rabbits in the oleuropein group were given oleuropein-rich extract added to the animals' water at doses of 20 mg/kg oleuropein for 15 days orally. After 15 days, all rabbits in the two groups were given general anesthesia with rocuronium of 1 mg/kg. After 1 day, animals were sacrificed and the liver tissue sections stained with H&E, toluidine blue and tryptase for immunohistochemical study. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between ALT, AST and albumin averages of the oleuropein and control groups (p> 0.05). The tryptase average of the control group was higher than the tryptase average of the oleuropein group and this difference was statistically significant (p=0.003). The T. blue average in the oleuropein group was higher than the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups (p=0.482). Conclusions: Rocuronium adverse effects, like hypersensitivity and anaphylaxis, may limit routine use of this substance. The use of oleuropein reduced the number of inflammatory cells and prevented degranulation.
Subject(s)
Animals , Male , Rabbits , Neuromuscular Nondepolarizing Agents/adverse effects , Iridoids/administration & dosage , Rocuronium/adverse effects , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Mast Cells/drug effects , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Aspartate Aminotransferases/blood , Serum Albumin/analysis , Random Allocation , Cell Degranulation/drug effects , Cell Aggregation/drug effects , Reproducibility of Results , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Diet Therapy/methods , Alanine Transaminase/blood , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis/methods , Liver/drug effects , Liver/enzymology , Mast Cells/pathologyABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Rocuronium causes pain and withdrawal movement during induction of anesthesia. In this study, palonosetron was investigated to have analgesic effect on the reduction of rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement. Methods: 120 patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups to receive either saline, lidocaine 20 mg, or palonosetron 0.075 mg with a tourniquet applied two minutes before thiopental sodium (5 mg.kg-1) was given intravenously. After loss of consciousness, rocuronium (0.6 mg.kg-1) was injected and the withdrawal movement was estimated by 4-point scale in a double-blind manner. Results: The overall incidence of rocuronium withdrawal movement was 50% with lidocaine (p = 0.038), 38% with palonosetron (p = 0.006) compared with 75% for saline. The incidence of no pain to mild pain was significantly lower in the lidocaine and palonosetron groups (85% and 92% respectively) than in the saline group (58%). However, there was no significant difference in withdrawal movement between the lidocaine and palonosetron groups. There was no severe movement with palonosetron. Conclusion: Pretreatment of palonosetron with venous occlusion may attenuate rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement as effective as the use of lidocaine. It suggested that peripheral action of palonosetron was effective to reduce rocuronium-induced withdrawal movement.
Resumo Justificativa: Rocurônio provoca dor e reflexo de retirada durante a indução da anestesia. Neste estudo, avaliamos se palonosetron tem efeito analgésico para reduzir esse movimento induzido por rocurónio. Métodos: Cento e vinte pacientes foram randomicamente designados para um de três grupos para receber solução salina, lidocaína (20 mg) ou palonosetron (0.075 mg), com aplicação de torniquete dois minutos antes da administração intravenosa de tiopental sódico (5 mg.kg-1). Após a perda de consciência, rocurônio (0.6 mg.kg-1) foi injetado e o reflexo de retirada foi avaliado com o uso de uma escala de quatro pontos, de modo duplo-cego. Resultados: A incidência global do reflexo de retirada induzido por rocurônio foi de 50% para lidocaína (p = 0,038), 38% para palonosetron (p = 0,006), em comparação com 75% para solução salina. A incidência de dor ausente ou leve foi significativamente menor nos grupos lidocaína e palonosetron (85% e 92%, respectivamente) que no grupo solução salina (58%). Porém, não houve diferença significativa no reflexo de retirada entre os grupos lidocaína e palonosetron. Não houve movimento grave com palonosetron. Conclusão: O pré-tratamento com palonosetron com oclusão venosa pode atenuar o reflexo de retirada induzido por rocurônio de modo tão eficaz como o uso de lidocaína. Sugeriu-se que a ação periférica de palonosetron foi eficaz para reduzir o reflexo de retirada induzido por rocurônio.